Capital One · Data PlatformClose (Esc)

Capital One · Data Platform

A system of record for data usages

An internal system of record that replaced a costly third-party tool

Role
Senior Product Designer
Timeline
Q4 2024 – Q1 2025
Platform
Desktop · Internal
Team
PM + 5 engineers
Data usage registry dashboard with search, status badges, and mapped datasets
Impact

Sole designer on 70+ screens, building the system of record for ~4,000 data usages that let Capital One decommission a costly third-party SaaS tool.

~4,000
Data usages managed in the new system
70+
Screens designed as the sole designer
1
Third-party tool fully decommissioned
Context

Nobody could say what the data was actually used for.

I designed for the analysts and engineers who need enterprise data that's easy to govern, find, and trust: a new system of record for “data usages,” the reports, models, and systems that consume data to serve a business purpose.

Diagram showing datasets feeding elements consumed into a data usage and data outputs

A data usage consumes elements from one or more datasets to produce an output. Here's an example.

Example flow from customer income dataset through Ability to Pay assessment to a new credit line
Problem

We were paying a vendor for workflows nobody wanted to use.

Capital One used a third-party tool to manage ~4,000 data usages, including hundreds of high-priority usages and tens of thousands of high-priority data elements. Workflows were disconnected from the internal data platform, the UI was slow and manual, and the vendor was migrating to a costly SaaS model.

We chose to build a new system of record, integrated into Capital One's internal data platform, for cost, control, and the customization a bought tool couldn't offer.

The third-party Enterprise Data Management tool for data usages
The third-party tool we replaced: dense tables, manual filters, no platform integration
Team & timeline

Timeline

Onboarding to production launch and full decommission of the third-party tool in ~9 months (mid-2024 to mid-2025).

My role

Sole designer across 70+ screens. I led end-to-end desktop design in tight “parallel-path” lockstep with product and 5+ engineers.

Research

So I took the old tool apart to see what it was hiding.

I reverse-engineered the old tool, mapping every flow, pain point, and requirement, then studied our internal patterns so new ones would align. The audience was broad: first-line consumers, producers, and leadership, plus second-line stewards, risk officers, and validators.

Brain dump mapping create, approve, search, and edit user flows
User flow brain dump
Handwritten research notes and early UI sketches in a notebook
Research notes
The calls I made

The decisions, and what each one cost.

Build vs. buy
Backed building in-house over renewing the vendor, since platform integration and customization won, at the cost of a fixed decommission deadline with one designer.
Density vs. approachability
Kept tables dense for the stewards who live in them; clarity came from color-coded status, priority, and risk badges, not from whitespace.
Speed vs. governance
Registration had to feel fast without skipping second-line risk review, so approval states became first-class UI instead of email threads.
Flow · Registration

From emailed spreadsheets to a guided flow

The old tool made users hand-enter up to 3,800 elements into spreadsheets and email them to admins.

A guided registration flow, step-by-step through input assets

Drawer to drill into a dataset without losing the full list.

Flow · Approve & Manage

A color-coded system for governance

Color-coded status, priority, risk, and assessment badges made dense governance easy to scan.

Owner dashboard: published, awaiting approval, and draft usages

Owners got a dashboard to review, filter, and act on every usage. I aligned it with senior leadership repeatedly, since executives would approve inside the tool themselves.

Flow · Search & View

Prioritizing what people actually needed

A card sort showed status and mapped datasets mattered most.

Details page: status bar + mapped datasets

Mapped datasets lead, with a color-coded status bar on top.

Impact

We turned the vendor tool off.

I shipped a new internal data-usage inventory built in-house and contributed new patterns and component hierarchy back to the platform. Positive early feedback on visibility and governance was enough to fully decommission the third-party SaaS tool.